Fig. 11. Sketch by the witnesses.

other than darker regions that appear to be nonrandom. This case must remain "open" until further information becomes available.

I have examined the photograph exhibited in the paper submitted by Haines and Vallee and read their discussion with considerable interest. While I agree that the image seen in Figure 1 is very suggestive, my impression is that it probably does not represent a physical object. This impression is based primarily on a visual inspection of the negative (Figure 6) under levels of magnification ranging from 3 x to 12 x. The following observations were noted: