Use ARROWS to page backward or forward

Imagemap

Page 16

 

Three sampling operations were conducted over this area.

Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the four soil samples.

The analysis began at CNES with the visual examination of sample P1 using a binocular enlarging lens. A selection of areas presenting an interesting appearance were later examined under a microscope.

The samples were then forwarded to various laboratories equipped for physical and chemical analysis in an effort to determine the element composition of the P1 and P2 samples, and to identify possible variations between the two samples. It was thought that such systematic comparisons might lead to the discovery of mechanical, thermal or radiation effects correlated with the phenomenon. (Samples Q1 and Q2 were not used at this stage). The following sections present the results of these independent analyses.

2. Visual and Microscope Analysis (CNES-Toulouse)

A series of photographs were taken using an optical microscope with low magnification. In these tests sample P1 was divided into two parts, respectively designated as P1a and P1b.

Sample P1a showed heavily compacted dirt with a crust 6 to 7 mm thick, predominantly composed of very dry limestone with only a few traces of dessicated vegetation in the form of moss. Curved striations are clearly seen on the surface, indicating that this dirt has been exposed to a rubbing effect that has resulted in the abrasion of some silicium grains (Figure 16). Further

TABLE I
Physical samples
Id Date Location Area Description Amount Depth
P1 Jan 9 on the ring tens of cm2 surface spots about 100 g 2 cm
P2 Feb 17 4 m away from ring tens of cm2 small shovelful of loose soil about 200 g surface
Q1 Jan 9 on the ring few cm2 surface soil few g surface
Q2 Jan 9 on the ring few cm2 depth soil few g 2 cm

 

ImageMap