9 posts / 0 new
Last post
root (Admin Adminovich) root (Admin Adminovich)'s picture
Would you like to use the forums?

All,

We are considering moving the online discussions from the ListServ to the web site. Would you be interested in posting on the SSE forums if we did so? If yes: please use this thread to make suggestions on topic areas for the forums beyond general discussion.

- SSE

JohannaB (Johanna Blomqvist) JohannaB (Johanna Blomqvist)'s picture
SSE forums

Hi All,

Yes, I would be interested. Maybe the interface would be more user friendly? However, I don't have anything specific to suggest now.

Cheers, Johanna
--
www.johannablomqvist.com

JohannaB (Johanna Blomqvist) JohannaB (Johanna Blomqvist)'s picture
SSE forums

Hi All,

Yes, I would be interested. Maybe the interface would be more user friendly? However, I don't have anything specific to suggest now.

Cheers, Johanna
--
www.johannablomqvist.com

fgorham (Frank G Landis)
make suggestion on topic area for the forums

I would like to have a topic created.

The topic title would be: Unifying Metaphysics

The opening description would be:

SSE is dedicated to exploration of phenomena not embraced by physics and other mainstream research. When looking beyond the outer bounty of knowledge there are many directions to go. These diverse directions are typically grouped together as ‘metaphysics’ by many, both the ones skeptical of the value of these pursuits and also those involved who have accepted this categorical naming. Some view the name ‘metaphysics’ as derogatory while others see it as empowering and unifying with like minds.

My question is “How can we pursue a unification of metaphysics in a constructive and supportive way?”

Let’s start by listing some criteria for the acceptance of a Unified Metaphysics, Then when the criteria are set we can focus on developing a scheme that can meet all criteria.

A satisfactory scheme should be:
All encompassing but fundamental scheme
Able to form a singular unique foundation for the many directions being explored
able to explain existing knowledge, science fields and experiences.

What other criteria can we add to this list?

fgorham (Frank G Landis)
deleted

deleted

Majorlucas (Martin Lucas)
Basis

Since the field of 'metaphysics' is so broad and encompasses a wide variety of authentic phenomena as well as a considerable amount of the not-so-authentic; our first endeavor would seem to me to be collecting and categorizing information. Once we have collected reports then we can work to understand its validity.

"Scientists" can ignore any number of separate reports about something, but when they are confronted with volumes of unexplained events they must accept that these things exists. Collecting these reports will also allow us to compile and digest them to see their commonality and hopefully the science behind them.

Jack Sarfatti (Jack Sarfatti) Jack Sarfatti (Jack Sarfatti)'s picture
Conscious AI & US Navy Close Encounters with "Tic Tac" UAVs

I was with Hal Puthoff and Kit Green late October, 2017 in London at the David Bohm Centennial (Fetzer Fdn) when they were coordinating the disclosure to NYT etc. My physics solution to the Tic Tac enigma with Professor of Physics Keith Wanser (Cal State Fullerton) as well as with team in UK, France, Italy will be discussed in a video by Emmy Award winning Sid Goldberg (Gaia.com) coming soon. See also, https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/top-physicist-claims-uss-nim...
For more details contact [email protected]

olivetoalison () olivetoalison ()'s picture
Metaphysicas

I concur regarding the need for understanding the scope of work that might be considered under the umbrella of "metaphysics" and how it might be organized. I would be willing to help out.

fgorham (Frank G Landis)
I appreciate the interest.

I appreciate the interest.
To the admin: I asked for a new topic but I think what would be done is a new

    forum

, next to General Discussion, where we would create related topics about Unified Metaphysics. Thanks.